The Pot Paradox

Open Review until 2026-05-08

Authors

  • Reshef Agam-Segal Virginia Military Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15845/nwr.v15.3781

Keywords:

impartialism, Logical Criticism, Philosophical Availability, Wittgenstein’s Lecture on Ethics

Abstract

Logical criticism can seem strange: If successful, it can prove its target illogical, i.e. not fully logically integrated. This can implicate the critic in a kind of paradox, however, which I call ‘pot paradox’ after a short story by Sholem Aleichem: for, if the target view is not logically integrated, is it really there in the first place—even to be criticized? – I propose a way to avert the difficulty: Logical criticism should avoid pronouncing views nonsensical and rather ask for clarifications and propose re-interpretations. I capture a moral aspect of this by borrowing Gabriel Marcel’s notion of ‘availability’: a kind of sharing in the confusion we wish to criticize and taking ownership of the difficulty. My main testcase is ‘impartialism.’ I examine Alice Crary’s apparent logical criticism of impartialism, which maintains that moral justifications require a vantage point outside individuals’ affective lives. I discuss ways of handling impartialism in a philosophically available manner, namely without pronouncing it confused or nonsensical. Here, I’m aided also by Wittgenstein’s ‘Lecture on Ethics,’ in which, or so I claim, he puts forward a kind of impartiality view. I offer a reading of parts of the Lecture.

References

Anscombe, Elizabeth (1959), An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. New York: Harper and Row.

Aristotle (2001), On the Soul, J. Sachs (trans.). Santa Fe: Green Lion Press.

Aristotle (2004), Nicomachean Ethics, R. Crisp (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Augustine (1955), Confessions and Enchiridion, A. C. Outler (ed.), A. C. Outler (trans.). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

Bollnow, Otto Friedrich (1984), “Marcel’s Concept of Availability”. In: The Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel, Schilpp, P. A. & Hahn, L. E. (eds.). La Salle, IL: Open Court, 177–199.

Carnap, Rudolph (1959), “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language”. In: Logical Positivism, A. J. Ayer (ed.). New York: The Free Press, 60–81.

Cavell, Stanley (1969), Must We Mean What We Say? New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Cavell, Stanley (1979), The Claim of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crary, Alice (2007), Beyond Moral Judgment. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Descartes, René (1982), Principles of Philosophy, Miller V. R. and Miller R. P. (trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Diamond, Cora (1991), “Secondary Sense”. In: The Realistic Spirit, Cambridge: MIT Press, 225–241.

Diamond, Cora (2000), “Ethics, Imagination and the Method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In: The New Wittgenstein, Crary, A. and Read R. (eds.), London: Routledge, 149–173.

Diamond, Cora (2012), “The Skies of Dante and Our Skies: A Response to Ilham Dilman”. Philosophical Investigations, 35(3), 187–204.

Frege, Gottlob (1951), “On Concept and Object”. Mind 60(238), 168–180.

Hacker, Peter (1987), Insight and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hobbes, Thomas (1996), Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hume, David (1977), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Kant, Immanuel (1929), Critique of Pure Reason, Kemp-Smith N. (trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Klemke, Elmer D. (1975), “Wittgenstein’s Lecture on Ethics.” Journal of Value Inquiry, 9(2), 118–127.

Korsgaard, Christine (1996), The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kripke, Saul (1972), Naming and Necessity. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

McDowell, John (1998), “Aesthetic Value, Objectivity, and the Fabric of the World”. In: Mind Value and Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 112–130.

Marcel, Gabriel (2002), Creative Fidelity, Rosthal, R. (trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2012), Phenomenology of Perception, Landes, D. A. (trans.). London: Routledge.

Minar, Edward (1998), “Wittgenstein on the Metaphysics of the Self: The Dialectic of Solipsism in Philosophical Investigations”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79, 329-354.

Mulhall, Stephen (2005), Philosophical Myths of the Fall. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nietzsche, Friedrich (1967), On the Genealogy of Morals, Kaufman, W. (trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

Nietzsche, Friedrich (1997), Twilight of the Idols, Polt, R. (trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.

Pigden, Charles (2010), “Coercive Theories of Meaning or Why Language Shouldn’t Matter (So Much) to Philosophy”. Logique & Analyse, 53(210), 151–184.

Plato (1997), Complete Works, Cooper J. M. (ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.

Quine, Willard Van Orman. (1986), Philosophy of Logic. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Russell, Bertrand (2010), The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. London: Routledge.

Ryle, Gilbert (1949), The Concept of Mind. London: Routledge.

Scruton Roger (2012), “Neurononsense: Why Brain Sciences Can’t Explain the Human Condition”. ABC Religion And Ethics, https://www.abc.net.au/religion/neurononsense-why-brain-sciences-cant-explain-the-human-conditio/10100564.

Sholem Aleichem, (2000), “The Pot”. In: Nineteen to the Dozen: Monologues and Bits and Bobs of Other Things, Ken Frieden (ed.), Ted Gorelick (trans.). Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 3–16.

Waismann, Friedrich (1965). “Notes on Talks with Wittgenstein”. The Philosophical Review, 74(1), 12–16.

Williams, Bernard (1985), Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Witherspoon, Edward, “Conceptions of Nonsense in Carnap and Wittgenstein”. In A. Crary & R. Read (eds.), The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, 2000, 315–349.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Anscombe G.E.M., and Rhees R. (eds.), Anscombe G.E.M. (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Pears D. F. & McGuinness B. F. (trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1965), “A Lecture on Ethics”. The Philosophical Review, 74(1), 3–12.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1979), Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge, 1932–1935, Alice Ambrose (ed.), Amherst: Prometheus Books.

Wright, Crispin (1980), Wittgenstein on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Agam-Segal, R. (2026). The Pot Paradox: Open Review until 2026-05-08. Nordic Wittgenstein Review, 15. https://doi.org/10.15845/nwr.v15.3781

Issue

Section

Articles