https://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/issue/feed Nordic Wittgenstein Review 2020-03-30T06:39:02+02:00 Simo Säätelä simo.saatela@uib.no Open Journal Systems <p><strong><em>Nordic Wittgenstein Review</em> (NWR)</strong> publishes original contributions on all aspects of Wittgenstein's thought and work.&nbsp;Each issue includes a peer-reviewed articles section, an archival section, and a book review section. In addition, most issues include&nbsp;an invited paper and/or an interview. The journal is published by the <em>Nordic Wittgenstein Society</em> (NWS).</p> <p>eISSN 2242-248X</p> https://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/article/view/3569 Note from the Editors 2020-03-24T00:50:52+01:00 Simo Säätelä simo.saatela@uib.no Gisela Bengtsson gisela.bengtsson@filosofi.uu.se Cato Wittusen cato.wittusen@uis.no Oskari Kuusela o.kuusela@uea.ac.uk 2020-03-20T11:14:20+01:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/article/view/3570 Open review information 2020-03-24T00:50:51+01:00 Simo Säätelä simo.saatela@uib.no 2020-03-20T11:55:48+01:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/article/view/3566 Wittgenstein’s Critique of the Additive Conception of Language 2020-03-30T06:39:02+02:00 James F. Conant jconant@uchicago.edu <p>This paper argues that Wittgenstein, both early and late, rejects the idea that the logically simpler and more fundamental case is that of "the mere sign" and that what a meaningful symbol is can be explained through the elaboration of an appropriately supplemented conception of the sign: the sign plus something (say, an interpretation or an assignment of meaning). Rather the sign, in the logically fundamental case of its mode of occurrence, is an internal aspect of the symbol. The Tractatus puts this point as follows: “The sign is that in the symbol which is perceptible by the senses.” Conversely, this means that it is essential to a symbol – to what a symbol is – that it have an essentially perceptible aspect. For Wittgenstein there is no privileged direction of explanatory priority between symbol and sign here: without signs there are no symbols (hence without language there is no thought) and without some sort of relation to symbols there are no signs (hence the philosopher’s concept of the supposedly "merely linguistic" presupposes an internal relation to symbols).</p> <p><strong><a href="https://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/article/view/3570/4209" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Open Review</a> until 2020-04-20</strong></p> 2020-03-23T00:00:00+01:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement##