On Philosophical Method and Analogical Fallacies
Open Review until 2026-01-04
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15845/nwr.v14.3716Keywords:
analogy, figurativeness, philosophical method, overview, metaphysicsAbstract
This article investigates the role played by the analysis of nonliteral language in Wittgenstein’s later philosophical method. In the first section, I briefly present his motivations for abandoning the Tractarian method and developing a new one, which is centered on the ideas of family resemblances and the overview or synoptic presentation of grammar. In the second section, I offer an account that attempts to unify the apparent variety of what Glock called “roots of […] philosophical confusion” by treating one of the items in his list, “analogies in the surface grammar of logically distinct expressions”, as the most central target of methodological synopsis. I conclude that the figurative use of ordinary-language terms in philosophical discourse generates the majority of our philosophical problems and that its investigation should therefore be seen as one of the defining features of Wittgenstein’s later philosophical method.
References
Engelmann, M., 2013. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Development: Phenomenology, Grammar, Method, and the Anthropological View. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Fischer, E., 2007. “Through Pictures to Problems: Cognitive Epistemology and Therapeutic Philosophy”. In Christoph Jäger & Winfried Löffler (eds.), Epistemology: Contexts, Values, Disagreement. Papers of the 34th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium in Kirchberg, 2011. The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, pp. 475–492.
Fischer, E., 2011. Philosophical Delusion and its Therapy: Outline of a Philosophical Revolution. New York: Routledge.
Glock, H., 1996. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pichler, A., 2023. Style, Method and Philosophy in Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramsey, F., 1923. “Critical Notice of L. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. Mind 32 (128):465-478.
Rosch, E. & Mervis, C., 1975. “Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories”. Cognitive Psychology 7 (4):573–605.
Stern, D., 2018. “Wittgenstein and Moore on Grammar”. In David G. Stern (ed.), Wittgenstein in the 1930s: Between the Tractatus and the Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1921/2004). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. McGuiness B. F. and Pears, D. (trs.). London: Routledge. [TLP]
Wittgenstein, L. (1929). “Some Remarks on Logical Form”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 9(1), 162–171. [SRLF]
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. G. E. M. Anscombe (ed.). New York: Wiley-Blackwell. [PI]
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The Blue and Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the ‘Philosophical Investigations.’ Rush Rhees (ed.). Oxford: Harper & Row. [BBB]
Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Ed. by G. E. M. Anscombe, Rush Rhees & G. H. von Wright. Oxford: Blackwell. [RFM]
Wittgenstein, L. (2000a). The Big Typescript. Michael Nedo (ed.). Hoboken: Wiley. [BT]
Wittgenstein, L. (2000b). Wittgenstein’s Nachlass. The Bergen Electronic Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [TS/MS]
Wittgenstein, L. (2016). Wittgenstein: Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1933: From the Notes of G. E Moore. Edited by David Stern, Brian Rogers, and Gabriel Citron. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [M]
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Henrique Mendes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
NWR uses the Creative Commons license CC-BY.
Vol. 1-3 used CC-BY-NC-SA. The collected works copyright ownership for Vol. 1-2 were shared by Nordic Wittgenstein Society and ontos Verlag/De Gruyter.
