Transfeminism and Political Forms of Life
Keywords:Transfeminism, Wittgenstein, Forms of Life, Political Activism
It is sometimes argued that there are pre-political, ‘natural’ characteristics that have a significant role in rendering political subjects, for instance that women are the subjects of feminism. These same arguments criticise transfeminism as a usurper of feminist priorities because it changes focus to the rights of groups whose members are not exclusively women. This essay challenges such criticism. It begins by defining transfeminism as a form of activism and an epistemological tool, in order to cogently address some of the views that oppose it. I then propose a way out of the conflict by showing how we can make better sense of transfeminism aided by Wittgenstein’s concept of forms of life, since both views contend that there are biological and environmental features that constitute the uniqueness as well as the diversity of the given human form of life, without implying that said diversity leads to relativism. The paper concludes that transfeminism, when conceptualised correctly, can indeed work with other feminisms and political movements in order to counter institutionalised and market-driven gender politics that only simulate to address feminist concerns.
Key words: transfeminism, Wittgenstein, forms of life, Judith Butler, feminist subject
Allen, S. et al., 2019. “Doing better in arguments about sex, gender and trans rights”. https://medium.com/@kathleenstock/doing-better-in-arguments-about-sex-and-gender-3bec3fc4bdb6, accessed: 27/12/ 2021.
Bettcher, T., 2013. “Trans Women and the Meaning of ‘Women’”. N. Power, R. Halwani and A. Soble eds. EDITOR, Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings. Rowan & Littlefield, 233-250.
Bettcher, T., 2020. “Feminist Perspectives on Trans Issues”. In: E. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/feminism-trans/, accessed: 27/12/ 2021.
Binetti, M., 2019. “La queerización postfeminista: del constructivismo trans/genérico a la eliminación de las mujeres”. La Aljaba. Segunda Época XXIII, 59-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19137/aljaba-2019-230103
Butler J., 1992. “Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of ‘Postmodernism’. Feminists Theorize the Political. J. Butler and J. Scott, eds., New York: Routledge, 3-21.
Butler, J., 1993. Bodies that Matter. On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J., 1999. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Cattien, J., 2017. “Feminist Epistemology and the Question of Difference Reconfigured: What can Wittgenstein Tell Us about ‘Women’?”. Journal of International Women’s Studies 18(3), 5-18.
Cavell, S. 1958. “Must We Mean What We Say?”. Inquiry 1(1), 172-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201745808601279
Cavell, S. 1988. “Declining decline: Wittgenstein as a Philosopher of Culture”. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31(3), 253-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748808602153
Garriga-López, C., 2019. “Transfeminism”. In: H. Chiang ed., Global Encyclopaedia of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Transgender and Queer History. Farmington Hills: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1619-1623.
Guerrero, S., 2020. “Hacia una nueva metafísica del género”. Debate Feminista 60, 48-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2020.60.03
Laugier, S., 2018a. “Cavell on Feminism and the Ethics of Care”. Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies (6) Cavell After Cavell: A Philosophy Without Tears, 55-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18192/cjcs.v0i6.4107
Laugier, S., 2018b. “Wittgenstein. Ordinary Language as Lifeform”. In: Ch. Martin, ed., Language, Form(s) of Life and Logic: Investigations After Wittgenstein. Berlin: De Gruyter, 277-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110518283-012
Jeffreys, S., 1994. “The Queer Disappearance of Lesbians. Sexuality in the Academy”. Women’s Studies International Forum 17(5), 459-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(94)00051-4
Koyama, E., 2001. “The Transfeminist Manifesto”. In: E. Koyama Transfeminism: a collection. Emi Koyama/The Feminist Conspiracy Press, 3-11.
Moyal-Sharrock, D., 2015. “Wittgenstein on Forms of Life, Patterns of Life and Ways of Living”. Nordic Wittgenstein Review Special Issue: Wittgenstein and Forms of Life, 21-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15845/nwr.v4i0.3362
Stock, K., 2018. “Changing the concept of ‘woman’ will cause unintended harms”. The Economist, https://www.economist.com/open-future/2018/07/06/changing-the-concept-of-woman-will-cause-unintended-harms, accessed: 21/12/ 2021.
Stock, K., 2019. “Sexual Orientation: What Is It?”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119(3), 295–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoz015
Valencia, S., 2018. “El transfeminismo no es un generismo”. Pléyade 22, 27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-36962018000200027
Venis, J., 2021. “Fighting Transfemicide in the Americas”. International Bar Association, https://www.ibanet.org/Fighting-transfemicide-in-the-Americas, accessed 14/12/2021.
Wittgenstein, L., 1967. Zettel. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright, eds., G.E.M. Anscombe, transl. University of California Press: Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Wittgenstein, L., 1997. Philosophical Investigations. G.E.M. Anscombe, transl.. Blackwell: Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L., 2001. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. G.H. von Wright, R. Rhees and G.E.M. Anscombe, eds., G.E.M. Anscombe, transl... Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wittgenstein, L., 2007. On Certainty. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright, eds., D. Paul and G.E.M. Anscombe, transl., Oxford: Blackwell.
Copyright (c) 2022 Martha Alicia Trevino-Tarango
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
NWR uses the Creative Commons license CC-BY.
Vol. 1-3 used CC-BY-NC-SA. The collected works copyright ownership for Vol. 1-2 were shared by Nordic Wittgenstein Society and ontos Verlag/De Gruyter.