Three Metaphors toward a Conception of Moral Change

Main Article Content

Nora Hämäläinen

Abstract

Contemporary moral philosophy is split between an inherently a-historical moral philosophy/theory on the one hand and a growing interest in moral history and the historicity of morality on the other. In between these, the very moments of moral change (and their implications for the possibility of moral realism and moral objectivity) are often left insufficiently attended to and under-theorized. Yet moral change is, arguably, one of the defining features of present day moral frameworks, and thus one of the main things we need to make sense of in moral philosophy. In this paper, I present an account of moral change through the use of three metaphors: the tipping point, the bargaining table and the strong rope. I suggest these as coordinates for the development of a full-blown, historically sensitive conception of morality.

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Nora Hämäläinen, University of Helsinki

Nora Hämäläinen is a researcher and docent in philosophy at the University of Helsinki.  Her work centers on questions concerning ethics, moral personhood, philosophy and literature, philosophical method and moral change. She is the author of Literature and Moral Theory (Bloomsbury 2015, paperback 2017) and Descriptive Ethics: What does Moral Philosophy Know about Morality (Palgrave Macmillan 2016), and co-editor of Language, Ethics and Animal Life: Wittgenstein and Beyond (Bloomsbury 2012, with Niklas Forsberg and Mikel Burley). She has been a research fellow at the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies in 2013-2016 and at the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study, Uppsala, 2016–2017. Since 2016 she is also editor of Sats – Northern European Journal for Philosophy.

References

Anscombe, G.E.M., 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy”. Philosophy 33 (124), pp. 1–19.
Cavell, S., 1969. “Knowing and Acknowledging”. In: Must We Mean What We Say? New York: Scribner's, pp. 238–266.
Cook, J., 1999. Morality and Cultural Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M., 2002. The Order of Things. London: Routledge.
Gladwell, M., 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little Brown.
Grodzins, M., 1958. The Metropolitan Area as a Racial Problem. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hacking, I., 1995. Rewriting the Soul – Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Hochschild, A. R., 2003. The Commercialization of Intimate Life – Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hämäläinen, N., 2016. Descriptive Ethics: What does Moral Philosophy Know about Morality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kuhn, T., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lessing, D., 2009. Walking in the Shade. London: HarperCollins.
MacDowell, J., 1998. Mind, Value and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
MacIntyre, A., 1981. After Virtue – A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.
Moody-Adams, M., 1999. “The Idea of Moral Progress”. Metaphilosophy 30 (1), pp. 168–184.
Moody-Adams, M., 1997. Fieldwork in Familiar Places. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Moody-Adams, M., 2016. “Moral Progress and Human Agency”. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (1), pp. 153–168.
Murdoch, I., 2001. The Sovereignty of Good over Other Concepts. London: Routledge.
Ojakangas, M., 2013. The Voice of Conscience: A Political Genealogy of Western Ethical Experience. New York: Bloomsbury.
Scanlon, T. M., 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schneewind, J. B., 1998. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segerdahl, P., 2014. Thinking about ethics: A collection of reflections from the Ethics Blog. Uppsala: Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University.
Taylor, C., 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Velleman, J. D., 2015. Foundations for Moral Relativism. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
Walker, M. U., 1998. Moral Understandings. A Feminist Study in Ethics. New York: Routledge.
Williams, B., 1993. Shame and Necessity. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Winch, P., 1987. Trying to Make Sense. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L., 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wong, D. B., 2006. Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.