A Missing Folio at the Beginning of Wittgenstein's MS 104

Main Article Content

Martin Pilch


A close investigation of Wittgenstein’s MS 104, which contains the so-called Prototractatus, has shown that the manuscript originally contained an additional folio that was later cut out and is now missing. The content of this missing folio could be partly reconstructed by a faint inverse imprint that it has left behind on page 2. The paper discusses the consequences of this discovery for the interpretation of the beginning and early formation of the Prototractatus, including the introduction and role of the numbering system. The paper also provides a transcription of the deepest visible textual layers of the first conception of the picture theory.

Author Biography

Martin Pilch

Martin Pilch studied theoretical physics, philosophy, history and law at the Universities of Graz and Vienna. He received a PhD in 1989 and holds the title Doctor of Jurisprudence since 2003. Now working for the Austrian government in research funding programs, he is responsible for the Christian Doppler Laboratories. His publications include two books on the constitutional theory of Carl Schmitt and medieval legal theory. His philosophical interests concentrate on German Idealism and the philosophy of law, as well as on the philosophy of mathematics and the early Wittgenstein. He is currently preparing a new transcription of MS 104 and TS 202.


Bazzocchi, L., 2006. “About ‘die letzte Zusammenfassung’”. In: G. Gasser, C. Kanzian, E. Runggaldier (eds.), Cultures. Conflict – Analysis – Dialogue. Papers of the 29th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg am Wechsel, pp. 36–38.

Bazzocchi, L., 2008. “The Date of Tractatus Beginning”. In: A. Hieke, H. Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences. Papers of the 31st International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg am Wechsel, pp. 20–22.

Bazzocchi, L., 2010. “The Prototractatus Manuscript and its Corrections”. In: N. Venturinha (ed.), Wittgenstein after his Nachlass, Basingstock: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 11–29.

Bazzocchi, L., 2010a. “Una diversa interpretazione della genesi e della struttura del Tractatus di Wittgenstein”. In: L. Bellotti, G. Paoletti (eds.), I Quaderni della ricerca, ETS, Pisa, pp. 47–64.

Bazzocchi, L., 2010b. L’Albero del Tractatus, Milano: Mimesis.

Bazzocchi, L., 2015. “A Better Appraisal of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Manuscript”. Philosophical Investigations 38, pp. 333–359.

Bartley, W.W., 1985. Wittgenstein, 2nd ed., Chicago: Open Court.

Dreben, B., Floyd, J., 2011. “Frege – Wittgenstein Correspondence”. In: E. De Pellegrin (ed.), Interactive Wittgenstein, Dodrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer, pp. 15–73.

Engelmann, P., 2006. “Ludwig Wittgenstein – Paul Engelmann. Briefwechsel”. In: I. Somavilla (ed.), Wittgenstein – Engelmann. Briefe, Begegnungen, Erinnerungen. Innsbruck, Wien: Haymon.

Erbacher, Ch.E., 2015. Formen des Klärens. Litterarisch-philosophische Darstellungsmittel in Wittgensteins Schriften, Münster: mentis.

Ficker, L. von, 2014. Ludwig von Ficker – Ludwig Wittgenstein. Briefwechsel (1914 – 1920), A. Steinsiek, A. Unterkircher (eds.), Innsbruck: innsbruck university press.

Floyd, J., 2011. “Prefatory Note to the Frege – Wittgenstein Correspondence”. In: E. De Pellegrin (ed.), Interactive Wittgenstein, Dodrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer, pp. 1–14.

Geschkowski, A., 2001. Die Entstehung von Wittgensteins Prototractatus, Bern.

Hacker, P.M.S., 2015. “How the Tractatus was meant to be read”. The Philosophical Quarterly 65, pp. 648–668.

Kang, J., 2005. “On the Composition of the Prototractatus”. The Philosophical Quarterly 55, pp. 1–20.

Keicher, P., 2012. “Bemerkungen zu Wittgensteins 'Prototractatus'”. In: M.G. Weiss, H. Greif (eds.), Ethics – Society – Politics. Papers of the 35th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg am Wechsel, pp. 140–143.

Kienzler, W., 2012. “Reading the Tractatus from the Beginning: How to Say Everything Clearly in Three Words”. In: P. Stekeler-Weithofer (ed.), Wittgenstein: zu Philosophie und Wissenschaft, Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 70–102.

Kürnberger, F., 1877. Literarische Herzenssachen. Reflexionen und Kritiken, Wien: L. Rosner.

Mayer, V., 1993. “The Numbering System of the Tractatus”. Ratio 6, pp. 108–120.

McGuinness, B., 1988. Wittgenstein: A Life. Young Ludwig 1889–1921, Berkeley, London: The University of California Press.

McGuinness, B.F., 2002. “Wittgenstein’s 1916 Abhandlung”. In: R. Haller, K. Puhl (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy. A Reassessment after 50 Years, Wien: ÖBV + HPT Verlag, pp. 272–282.

Monk, R., 1991, Ludwig Wittgenstein. The Duty of Genius, London: Vintage.

Pilch, M., 2013. “Vom Prototractatus zum Tractatus”. In: D. Moyal-Sharrock,

V.A. Munz, A. Coliva (eds.), Mind, Language and Action. Papers of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg am Wechsel, pp. 319–321.

Potter, M., 2013. “Wittgenstein’s pre-Tractatus manuscripts: a new appraisal”. In: P. Sullivan, M. Potter, Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. History & Interpretation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–39.

Venturinha, N., 2010. Lógica, Ética, Grammática. Wittgenstein e o Método da Filosofia, Lisboa: Impresa Ncional-Casa da Moeda.

Wittgenstein, L., CC 1995. Cambridge Letters, B. McGuinness, G.H.v. Wright (ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L., TLP 1989. Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung – Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Kritische Edition by B. McGuinness and J. Schulte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Wittgenstein, L., TLP 2014. The Tractatus According to its Own Form, with tree-wise arrangement by L. Bazzocchi (ed.).

Wittgenstein, L., TB 1998. “Notebooks 1914–1916”. In: Notebooks 1914-1916, G.H. von Wright, G.E.M. Anscombe (eds.), 2nd ed., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 2–91.

Wittgenstein, L., PT 1971. Prototractatus. An early version of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. B. McGuinness, T. Nyberg, G.H. v. Wright (eds.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Wright, G.H. von, 1971. “Historical Introduction. The origin of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In: Wittgenstein PT 1971, pp. 1–34